One day a highly
contagious and lethal strain of influenza will sweep across all
humanity, claiming millions of lives. It may arrive in months or not
for years--but the next pandemic is inevitable.
Are we ready?
By
W. Wayt Gibbs and Christine Soares
When the
levees collapsed in New Orleans, the faith of Americans in their
government's ability to protect them against natural disasters crumbled
as well. Michael Chertoff, the secretary of homeland security who led
the federal response, called Hurricane Katrina and the flood it spawned
an "ultracatastrophe" that "exceeded the foresight of the planners."
But in truth the failure was not a lack of foresight. Federal,
state and local authorities had a plan for how governments would
respond if a hurricane were to hit New Orleans with 120-mile-per-hour
winds, raise a storm surge that overwhelmed levees and water pumps, and
strand thousands inside the flooded city. Last year they even practiced
it. Yet when Katrina struck, the execution of that plan was abysmal.
The lethargic, poorly coordinated and undersized response
raises concerns about how nations would cope with a much larger and
more lethal kind of natural disaster that scientists warn will occur,
possibly soon: a pandemic of influenza. The threat of a flu pandemic is
more ominous, and its parallels to Katrina more apt, than it might
first seem. The routine seasonal upsurges of flu and of hurricanes
engender a familiarity that easily leads to complacency and inadequate
preparations for the "big one" that experts admonish is sure to come.
The most fundamental thing to understand about serious pandemic
influenza is that, except at a molecular level, the disease bears
little resemblance to the flu that we all get at some time. An
influenza pandemic, by definition, occurs only when the influenza virus
mutates into something dangerously unfamiliar to our immune systems and
yet is able to jump from person to person through a sneeze, cough or
touch.
Flu pandemics emerge unpredictably every generation or so, with
the last three striking in 1918, 1957 and 1968. They get their start
when one of the many influenza strains that constantly circulate in
wild and domestic birds evolves into a form that infects us as well.
That virus then adapts further or exchanges genes with a flu strain
native to humans to produce a novel germ that is highly contagious
among people.
Some pandemics are mild. But some are fierce. If the virus
replicates much faster than the immune system learns to defend against
it, it will cause severe and sometimes fatal illness, resulting in a
pestilence that could easily claim more lives in a single year than
AIDS has in 25. Epidemiologists have warned that the next pandemic
could sicken one in every three people on the planet, hospitalize many
of those and kill tens to hundreds of millions. The disease would spare
no nation, race or income group. There would be no certain way to avoid
infection.
Scientists cannot predict which influenza strain will cause a
pandemic or when the next one will break out. They can warn only that
another is bound to come and that the conditions now seem ripe, with a
fierce strain of avian flu killing people in Asia and infecting birds
in a rapid westward lunge toward Europe. That strain, influenza A
(H5N1) does not yet pass readily from one person to another. But the
virus is evolving, and some of the affected avian species have now
begun their winter migrations.
As a sense of urgency grows, governments and health experts are
working to bolster four substantial lines of defense against a
pandemic: surveillance, vaccines, containment measures and medical
treatments. The U.S. plans to release by October a pandemic
preparedness plan that surveys the strength of each of these
barricades. Some failures are inevitable, but the more robust those
preparations are, the less humanity will suffer. The experience of
Katrina forces a question: Will authorities be able to keep to their
plans even when a large fraction of their own workforce is downed by
the flu?
Surveillance: What Is Influenza Up to Now? Our first defense
against a new flu is the ability to see it coming. Three international
agencies are coordinating the global effort to track H5N1 and other
strains of influenza. The World Health Organization (WHO), with 110
influenza centers in 83 countries, monitors human cases. The World
Organization for Animal Health (OIE, formerly the Office International
des Épizooties) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) collect
reports on outbreaks in birds and other animals. But even the managers
of these surveillance nets acknowledge that they are still too porous
and too slow.
ADVERTISEMENT
Speed is of the essence when dealing with a fast-acting airborne virus
such as influenza. Authorities probably have no realistic chance of
halting a nascent pandemic unless they can contain it within 30 days.
The clock begins ticking the moment that the first victim of a
pandemic-capable strain becomes contagious.
The only way to catch that emergence in time is to monitor
constantly the spread of each outbreak and the evolution of the virus's
abilities. The WHO assesses both those factors to determine where the
world is in the pandemic cycle, which a new guide issued in April
divides into six phases.
The self-limiting outbreaks of human H5N1 influenza seen so far
bumped the alert level up to phase three, two steps removed from
outright pandemic (phase six). Virologists try to obtain samples from
every new H5N1 patient to scout for signs that the avian virus is
adapting to infect humans more efficiently. It evolves in two ways:
gradually through random mutation, and more rapidly as different
strains of influenza swap genes inside a single animal or person.
The U.S. has a sophisticated flu surveillance system that
funnels information on hospital visits for influenzalike illness,
deaths from respiratory illness and influenza strains seen in public
health laboratories to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
in Atlanta. "But the system is not fast enough to take the isolation or
quarantine action needed to manage avian flu," said Julie L.
Gerberding, the CDC director, at a February conference. "So we have
been broadening our networks of clinicians and veterinarians."
In several dozen cases where travelers to the U.S. from
H5N1-affected Asian countries developed severe flulike symptoms,
samples were rushed to the CDC, says Alexander Klimov of the CDC's
influenza branch. "Within 40 hours of hospitalization we can say
whether the patient has H5N1. Within another six hours we can analyze
the genetic sequence of the hemagglutinin gene" to estimate the
infectiousness of the strain. (The virus uses hemagglutinin to pry its
way into cells.) A two-day test then reveals resistance to antiviral
drugs, he says.
The next pandemic could break out anywhere, including in the
U.S. But experts think it is most likely to appear first in Asia, as do
most influenza strains that cause routine annual epidemics. Aquatic
birds such as ducks and geese are the natural hosts for influenza, and
in Asia many villagers reside cheek by bill with such animals.
Surveillance in the region is still spotty, however, despite a slow
trickle of assistance from the WHO, the CDC and other organizations.
A recent H5N1 outbreak in Indonesia illustrates both the
problems and the progress. In a relatively wealthy suburb of Jakarta,
the eight-year-old daughter of a government auditor fell ill in late
June. A doctor gave her antibiotics, but her fever worsened, and she
was hospitalized on June 28. A week later her father and one-year-old
sister were also admitted to the hospital with fever and cough. The
infant died on July 9, the father on July 12.
The next day an astute doctor alerted health authorities and
sent blood and tissue samples to a U.S. Navy medical research unit in
Jakarta. On July 14 the girl died; an internal report shows that on
this same day Indonesian technicians in the naval laboratory determined
that two of the three family members had H5N1 influenza. The government
did not acknowledge this fact until July 22, however, after a WHO lab
in Hong Kong definitively isolated the virus.
The health department then readied hospital wards for more flu
patients, and I Nyoman Kandun, head of disease control for Indonesia,
asked WHO staff to help investigate the outbreak. Had this been the
onset of a pandemic, the 30-day containment window would by that time
have closed. Kandun called off the investigation two weeks later. "We
could not find a clue as to where these people got the infection," he
says.
Local custom prohibited autopsies on the three victims. Klaus
Stöhr of the WHO Global Influenza Program has complained that the near
absence of autopsies on human H5N1 cases leaves many questions
unanswered. Which organs does H5N1 infect? Which does it damage most?
How strongly does the immune system respond?
Virologists worry as well that they have too little information about
the role of migratory birds in transmitting the disease across borders.
In July domestic fowl infected with H5N1 began turning up in Siberia,
then Kazakhstan, then Russia. How the birds caught the disease remains
a mystery.
Frustrated with the many unanswered questions, Stöhr and other
flu scientists have urged the creation of a global task force to
supervise pandemic preparations. The OIE in August appealed for more
money to support surveillance programs it is setting up with the FAO
and the WHO.
"We clearly need to improve our ability to detect the virus,"
says Bruce G. Gellin, who coordinates U.S. pandemic planning as head of
the National Vaccine Program Office at the U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS). "We need to invest in these countries to help
them, because doing so helps everybody."
Vaccines: Who Will Get Them - and How Quickly? Pandemics of
smallpox and polio once ravaged humanity, but widespread immunization
drove those diseases to the brink of extinction. Unfortunately, that
strategy will not work against influenza--at least not without a major
advance in vaccine technology.
Indeed, if an influenza pandemic arrives soon, vaccines against
the emergent strain will be agonizingly slow to arrive and
frustratingly short in supply. Biology, economics and complacency all
contribute to the problem.
Many influenza strains circulate at once, and each is
constantly evolving. "The better the match between the vaccine and the
disease virus, the better the immune system can defend against the
virus," Gellin explains. So every year manufacturers fashion a new
vaccine against the three most threatening strains. Biologists first
isolate the virus and then modify it using a process called reverse
genetics to make a seed virus. In vaccine factories, robots inject the
seed virus into fertilized eggs laid by hens bred under hygienic
conditions. The pathogen replicates wildly inside the eggs.
Vaccine for flu shots is made by chemically dissecting the
virus and extracting the key proteins, called antigens, that stimulate
the human immune system to make the appropriate antibodies. A different
kind of vaccine, one inhaled rather than injected, incorporates live
virus that has been damaged enough that it can infect but not sicken.
The process requires six months to transform viral isolates into
initial vials of vaccine.
Because people will have had no prior exposure to a pandemic
strain of influenza, everyone will need two doses: a primer and then a
booster about four weeks later. So even those first in line for
vaccines are unlikely to develop immunity until at least seven or eight
months following the start of a pandemic.
And there will undoubtedly be a line. Total worldwide
production of flu vaccine amounts to roughly 300 million doses a year.
Most of that is made in Europe; only two plants operate in the U.S.
Last winter, when contamination shut down a Chiron facility in Britain,
Sanofi Pasteur and MedImmune pulled out all stops on their American
lines--and produced 61 million doses. The CDC recommends annual flu
immunization for high-risk groups that in the U.S. include some 185
million people.
Sanofi now runs its plant at full bore 365 days a year. In July
it broke ground for a new facility in Pennsylvania that will double its
output--in 2009. Even in the face of an emergency, "it would be very
hard to compress that timeline," says James T. Matthews, who sits on
Sanofi's pandemic-planning working group. He says it would not be
feasible to convert factories for other kinds of vaccines over to make
flu shots.
Pascale Wortley of the CDC's National Immunization Program
raises another concern. Pandemics typically overlap with the normal flu
season, she notes, and flu vaccine plants can make only one strain at a
time. Sanofi spokesman Len Lavenda agrees that "we could face a
Sophie's choice: whether to stop producing the annual vaccine in order
to start producing the pandemic vaccine."
MedImmune aims to scale up production of its inhalable vaccine from
about two million doses a year to 40 million doses by 2007. But Gellin
cautions that it might be too risky to distribute live vaccine derived
from a pandemic strain. There is a small chance, he says, that the
virus in the vaccine could exchange genes with a "normal" flu virus in
a person and generate an even more dangerous strain of influenza.
Because delays and shortages in producing vaccine against a
pandemic are unavoidable, one of the most important functions of
national pandemic plans is to push political leaders to decide in
advance which groups will be the first to receive vaccine and how the
government will enforce its rationing. The U.S. national vaccine
advisory committee recommended in July that the first shots to roll off
the lines should go to key government leaders, medical caregivers,
workers in flu vaccine and drug factories, pregnant women, and those
infants, elderly and ill people who are already in the high-priority
group for annual flu shots. That top tier includes about 46 million
Americans.
Among CDC planners, Wortley says, "there is a strong feeling that we
ought to say beforehand that the government will purchase some amount
of vaccine to guarantee equitable distribution." Australia, Britain,
France and other European governments are working out advance contracts
with vaccine producers to do just that. The U.S., so far, has not.
In principle, governments could work around these supply
difficulties by stockpiling vaccine. They would have to continually
update their stocks as new strains of influenza threatened to go
global; even doing so, the reserves would probably always be a step or
two behind the disease. Nevertheless, Wortley says, "it makes sense to
have H5N1 vaccine on hand, because even if it is not an exact match, it
probably would afford some amount of protection" if the H5N1 strain
evolved to cause a pandemic.
To that end, the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases (NIAID) last year distributed an H5N1 seed virus
created from a victim in Vietnam by scientists at St. Jude Children's
Research Hospital in Memphis. The HHS then placed an order with Sanofi
for two million doses of vaccine against that strain. Human trials
began in March, and "the preliminary results from the clinical trial
indicate that the vaccine would be protective," says NIAID director
Anthony S. Fauci. "HHS Secretary Michael Leavitt is trying to negotiate
to get up to 20 million doses," he adds. (Leavitt announced in
September that HHS had increased its H5N1 vaccine order by $100
million.) According to Gel-lin, current vaccine producers could
contribute at most 15 million to 20 million doses a year to the U.S.
stockpile.
Those numbers are probably over-optimistic, however. The trial
tested four different concentrations of antigen. A typical annual flu
shot has 45 micrograms of protein and covers three strains of
influenza. Officials had expected that 30 micrograms of H5N1
antigen--two shots, with 15 micrograms in each--would be enough to
induce immunity. But the preliminary trial results suggest that 180
micrograms of antigen are needed to immunize one person.
An order for 20 million conventional doses may thus actually yield only
enough H5N1 vaccine for about 3.3 million people. The true number could
be even lower, because H5 strains grow poorly in eggs, so each batch
yields less of the active antigen than usual. This grim picture may
brighten, however, when NIAID analyzes the final results from the
trial. It may also be possible to extend vaccine supplies with the use
of adjuvants (substances added to vaccines to increase the immune
response they induce) or new immunization approaches, such as injecting
the vaccine into the skin rather than into muscle.
Caching large amounts of prepandemic vaccine, though not
impossible, is clearly a challenge. Vaccines expire after a few years.
At current production rates, a stockpile would never grow to the 228
million doses needed to cover the three highest priority groups, let
alone to the roughly 600 million doses that would be needed to
vaccinate everyone in the U.S. Other nations face similar limitations.
The primary reason that capacity is so tight, Matthews explains, is
that vaccine makers aim only to meet the demand for annual
immunizations when making business decisions. "We really don't see the
pandemic itself as a market opportunity," he says.
To raise manufacturers' interest, "we need to offer a number of
incentives, ranging from liability insurance to better profit margins
to guaranteed purchases," Fauci acknowledges. Long-term solutions,
Gellin predicts, may come from new technologies that allow vaccines to
be made more efficiently, to be scaled up more rapidly, to be effective
at much lower doses and perhaps to work equally well on all strains of
influenza.
Rapid Response: Could a Pandemic Be Stopped? As recently as
1999, WHO had a simple definition for when a flu pandemic began: with
confirmation that a new virus was spreading between people in at least
one country. Thereafter, stopping the flu's lightning-fast expansion
was unthinkable--or so it then seemed. But because of recent advances
in the state of disease surveillance and antiviral drugs, the latest
version of WHO's guidelines recognizes a period on the cusp of the
pandemic when a flu virus ready to burst on the world might instead be
intercepted and restrained, if not stamped out.
Computer models and common sense indicate that a containment
effort would have to be exceptionally swift and efficient. Flu moves
with extraordinary speed because it has such a short incubation
period--just two days after infection by the virus, a person may start
showing symptoms and shedding virus particles that can infect others.
Some people may become infectious a day before their symptoms appear.
In contrast, people infected by the SARS coronavirus that emerged from
China in 2003 took as long as 10 days to become infectious, giving
health workers ample time to trace and isolate their contacts before
they, too, could spread the disease.
Contact tracing and isolation alone could never contain flu, public
health experts say. But computer-simulation results published in August
showed when up to 30 million doses of antiviral drugs and a
low-efficacy vaccine were added to the interventions a chance emerged
to thwart a potential pandemic.
Conditions would have to be nearly ideal. Modeling a population of 85
million based on the demographics and geography of Thailand, Neil M.
Ferguson of Imperial College London found that health workers would
have at most 30 days from the start of person-to-person viral
transmission to deploy antivirals as both treatment and preventives
wherever outbreaks were detected.
But even after seeing the model results earlier this year, WHO
officials expressed doubt that surveillance in parts of Asia is
reliable enough to catch a budding epidemic in time. In practice,
confirmation of some human H5N1 cases has taken more than 20 days, WHO
flu chief Stöhr warned a gathering of experts in Washington, D.C., this
past April. That leaves just a narrow window in which to deliver the
drugs to remote areas and dispense them to as many as one million
people.
Partial immunity in the population could buy more time, however,
according to Ira M. Longini, Jr., of Emory University. He, too, modeled
intervention with antivirals in a smaller community based on Thai
demographic data, with outcomes similar to Ferguson's. But Longini
added scenarios in which people had been vaccinated in advance. He
assumed that an existing vaccine, such as the H5N1 prototype version
some countries have already developed, would not perfectly match a new
variant of the virus, so his model's vaccinees were only 30 percent
less likely to be infected. Still, their reduced susceptibility made
containing even a highly infectious flu strain possible in simulations.
NIAID director Fauci has said that the U.S. and other nations with H5N1
vaccine are still considering whether to direct it toward prevention in
the region where a human-adapted version of that virus is most likely
to emerge--even if that means less would remain for their own citizens.
"If we're smart, we would," Longini says.
Based on patterns of past pandemics, experts expect that once a new
strain breaks loose, it will circle the globe in two or three waves,
each potentially lasting several months but peaking in individual
communities about five weeks after its arrival. The waves could be
separated by as long as a season: if the first hit in springtime, the
second might not begin until late summer or early fall. Because
meaningful amounts of vaccine tailored to the pandemic strain will not
emerge from factories for some six months, government planners are
especially concerned with bracing for the first wave.
Once a pandemic goes global, responses will vary locally as individual
countries with differing resources make choices based on political
priorities as much as on science. Prophylactic use of antivirals is an
option for a handful of countries able to afford drug stockpiles,
though not a very practical one. No nation has enough of the drugs at
present to protect a significant fraction of its population for months.
Moreover, such prolonged use has never been tested and could cause
unforeseen problems. For these reasons, the U.K. declared this past
July that it would use its pandemic stockpile primarily for treating
patients rather than for protecting the uninfected. The U.S., Canada
and several other countries are still working out their priorities for
who will receive antivirals and when.
For most countries there will be no choice: what the WHO calls
nonpharmaceutical interventions will have to be their primary defense.
Although the effectiveness of such measures has not been extensively
researched, the WHO gathered flu specialists in Geneva in March 2004 to
try to determine which actions medical evidence does support. Screening
incoming travelers for flu symptoms, for instance, "lacks proven health
benefit," the group concluded, although they acknowledged that
countries might do it anyway to promote public confidence. Similarly,
they were skeptical that public fever screening, fever hotlines or
fever clinics would do much to slow the spread of the disease.
The experts recommended surgical masks for flu patients and
health workers exposed to those patients. For the healthy, hand washing
offers more protection than wearing masks in public, because people can
be exposed to the virus at home, at work and by touching contaminated
surfaces--including the surface of a mask.
Traditional "social distancing" measures, such as banning
public gatherings or shutting down mass transit, will have to be guided
by what epidemiologists find once the pandemic is under way. If
children are especially susceptible to the virus, for example--as was
the case in 1957 and 1968--or if they are found to be an important
source of community spread, then governments may consider closing
schools.
Treatment: What Can Be Done for the Sick?
If two billion become sick, will 10 million die? Or 100 million? Public
health specialists around the world are struggling to quantify the
human toll of a future flu pandemic. Casualty estimates vary so widely
because until it strikes, no one can be certain whether the next
pandemic strain will be mild, like the 1968 virus that some flu
researchers call a "wimp"; moderately severe, like the 1957 pandemic
strain; or a stone-cold killer, like the "Great Influenza" of 1918.
For now, planners are going by rules of thumb: because no one would
have immunity to a new strain, they expect 50 percent of the population
to be infected by the virus. Depending on its virulence, between one
third and two thirds of those people will become sick, yielding a
clinical attack rate of 15 to 35 percent of the whole population. Many
governments are therefore trying to prepare for a middle-ground
estimate that 25 percent of their entire nation will fall ill.
No government is ready now. In the U.S., where states have
primary responsibility for their residents' health, the Trust for
America's Health (TFAH) estimates that a "severe" pandemic virus
sickening 25 percent of the population could translate into 4.7 million
Americans needing hospitalization. The TFAH notes that the country
currently has fewer than one million staffed hospital beds.
For frontline health workers, a pandemic's severity will boil down to
the sheer number of patients and the types of illness they are
suffering. These, in turn, could depend on both inherent properties of
the virus and susceptibility of various subpopulations to it, according
to Maryland's pandemic planner, Jean Taylor. A so-called mild pandemic,
for example, might resemble seasonal flu but with far larger numbers
infected.
Ordinarily, those hardest hit by annual flu are people who have
complications of chronic diseases, as well as the very young, the very
old and others with weak immune systems. The greatest cause of seasonal
flu-related deaths is pneumonia brought on by bacteria that invade
after flu has depleted the body's defenses, not by the flu virus
itself. Modeling a pandemic with similar qualities, Dutch national
health agency researchers found that hospitalizations might be reduced
by 31 percent merely by vaccinating the usual risk groups against
bacterial pneumonia in advance.
In contrast, the 1918 pandemic strain was most lethal to otherwise
healthy young adults in their 20s and 30s, in part because their immune
systems were so hardy. Researchers studying that virus have discovered
that it suppresses early immune responses, such as the body's release
of interferon, which normally primes cells to resist attack. At the
same time, the virus provokes an extreme immune overreaction known as a
cytokine storm, in which signaling molecules called cytokines summon a
ferocious assault on the lungs by immune cells.
Doctors facing the same phenomenon in SARS patients tried to quell the
storm by administering interferon and cytokine-suppressing
corticosteroids. If the devastating cascade could not be stopped in
time, one Hong Kong physician reported, the patients' lungs became
increasingly inflamed and so choked with dead tissue that pressurized
ventilation was needed to get enough oxygen to the bloodstream.
Nothing about the H5N1 virus in its current form offers reason to hope
that it would produce a wimpy pandemic, according to Frederick G.
Hayden, a University of Virginia virologist who is advising WHO on
treating avian flu victims. "Unless this virus changes dramatically in
pathogenicity," he asserts, "we will be confronted with a very lethal
strain." Many H5N1 casualties have suffered acute pneumonia deep in the
lower lungs caused by the virus itself, Hayden says, and in some cases
blood tests indicated unusual cytokine activity. But the virus is not
always consistent. In some patients, it also seems to multiply in the
gut, producing severe diarrhea. And it is believed to have infected the
brains of two Vietnamese children who died of encephalitis without any
respiratory symptoms.
Antiviral drugs that fight the virus directly are the optimal
treatment, but many H5N1 patients have arrived on doctors' doorsteps
too late for the drugs to do much good. The version of the strain that
has infected most human victims is also resistant to an older class of
antivirals called amantadines, possibly as a result of those drugs
having been given to poultry in parts of Asia. Laboratory experiments
indicate that H5N1 is still susceptible to a newer class of antivirals
called neuraminidase inhibitors (NI) that includes two products,
oseltamivir and zanamivir, currently on the market under the brand
names Tamiflu and Relenza. The former comes in pill form; the latter is
a powder delivered by inhaler. To be effective against seasonal flu
strains, either drug must be taken within 48 hours of symptoms
appearing.
The only formal test of the drugs against H5N1 infection, however, has
been in mice. Robert G. Webster of St. Jude Children's Research
Hospital reported in July that a mouse equivalent of the normal human
dose of two Tamiflu pills a day eventually subdued the virus, but the
mice required treatment for eight days rather than the usual five. The
WHO is organizing studies of future H5N1 victims to determine the
correct amount for people.
Even at the standard dosage, however, treating 25 percent of the U.S.
population would require considerably more Tamiflu, or its equivalent,
than the 22 million treatment courses the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services planned to stockpile as of September. An advisory
committee has suggested a minimum U.S. stockpile of 40 million
treatment courses (400 million pills). Ninety million courses would be
enough for a third of the population, and 130 million would allow the
drugs to also be used to protect health workers and other essential
personnel, the committee concluded.
Hayden hopes that before a pandemic strikes, a third NI called
peramivir may be approved for intravenous use in hospitalized flu
patients. Long-acting NIs might one day be ideal for stockpiling
because a single dose would suffice for treatment or offer a week's
worth of prevention.
These additional drugs, like a variety of newer approaches to
fighting flu, all have to pass clinical testing before they can be
counted on in a pandemic. Researchers would also like to study other
treatments that directly modulate immune system responses in flu
patients. Health workers will need every weapon they can get if the
enemy they face is as deadly as H5N1.
Fatality rates in diagnosed H5N1 victims are running about 50 percent.
Even if that fell to 5 percent as the virus traded virulence for
transmissibility among people, Hayden warns, "it would still represent
a death rate double [that of] 1918, and that's despite modern
technologies like antibiotics and ventilators." Expressing the worry of
most flu experts at this pivotal moment for public health, he cautions
that "we're well behind the curve in terms of having plans in place and
having the interventions available."
Never before has the world been able to see a flu pandemic on
the horizon or had so many possible tools to minimize its impact once
it arrives. Some mysteries do remain as scientists watch the evolution
of a potentially pandemic virus for the first time, but the past makes
one thing certain: even if the dreaded H5N1 never morphs into a form
that can spread easily between people, some other flu virus surely
will. The stronger our defenses, the better we will weather the storm
when it strikes. "We have only one enemy," CDC director Gerberding has
said repeatedly, "and that is complacency."